| ranoumeasewi | Date: Thursday, 11.28.2013, 12:47 PM | Message # 1 |
|
Sergeant
Group: Users
Messages: 22
Status: Offline
| nearly 21 million folks -- already have diabetes.And also the diabetes epidemic continues to grow by almost 5% a year, based on a studyled by Linda S. Geiss, MA, the CDC's chief of diabetes surveillance. Geiss presented the analysis findings at the American Diabetes Association's67th Annual Scientific Sessions, held June 22-26 in Chicago. "We discovered that diabetes and obesity are growing together," Geisssays. "It has exploded for the last 15 years and there's no hint of itslowing down." Could we stop the epidemic? No, Geiss says -- not until we discover thebrakes. "The strength and magnitude of the change is so great, this is notsomething we can stop overnight," she says. "Like a runaway train, wemust slow down before we can stop it." Geiss's team viewed data from U.S. health surveys in the years 1963to 2005. They found three distinct measures in the diabetes epidemic: 1963 to 1975 was obviously a period of a sharp surge in diabetes. Prevalenceincreased from 13.6 to 25.8 per 1,000 Americans. Diabetes leveled off in 1975, and failed to increase until 1990. It's notclear precisely why this happened. It could possibly simply be a result of thestandardization of diabetes diagnosis in 1975. "Then, in 1990, diabetes really became popular," Geiss says. Prevalenceshot up from 26.4 to 54.5 per 1,000 people. Ann Albright, PhD, RD, director from the CDC's division of diabetestranslation, says this diabetes surge could undo the progress that's beenachieved in fighting heart disease. "With diabetes starting to strike at younger ages, organic beef reverse thetrends we have seen in lessening heart disease," Albright said within an ADAnews conference. "Obesity and diabetes are essential public healthproblems." Coronary disease isn't the only issue; diabetes also affects small bloodvessels and the nerve cells. One of these brilliant complications is a sight-threateningeye condition called diabetic retinopathy. Another study with CDC researcher James Boyle, PhD, shows that by 2050,diabetes will customize the eyes of nearly 18 million Americans. "We project the amount of people with diabetic retinopathy andvision-threatening diabetic retinopathy to triple," Boyle and colleaguesreported on the ADA. "The number of whites and blacks 50 years of age andolder with diabetes who've cataracts will probably increase 238% from 2005 to2050. Additionally, between 2005 and 2050, our projections suggest a 12-foldincrease in the number of Hispanics with diabetes 65 a few years older who haveglaucoma." B Hearing are often an issue for people with diabetes. A report withresearcher Catherine C. Cowie, PhD, in the National Institute of Diabetes andDigestive and Kidney Diseases, signifies that diabetes doubles a person's risk ofhearing impairment. B The study suggests that 40% of people with diabetes might be affected some degreeof hearing impairment. B Can the U.S. really manage to do what's needed to derail the diabetesepidemic? It could be that we can't afford to never. B "The estimated annual price of diabetes in the U.S. is $132 billion --and that is certainly an underestimate," Albright said. "It willabsolutely demand a coordinated effort to change things around."By Daniel DeNoon Reviewed by Louise ChangB)2005-2006 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved bailey button uggs chestnut
Lebanese troops pounded a Palestinian refugee camp with artillery and tank fire for a second day Monday, raising huge columns of smoke as they battled a militant group suspected of ties to al Qaeda from the worst violence since the end of the 1975-90 civil war.Nearly 50 combatants died in the first day of fighting Sunday, nonetheless it was not known what number of civilians have been killed within the Nahr el-Bared camp on the outskirts of the northern port town of Tripoli.Palestinian officials in the camp reported at the very least nine civilians died Monday, along with 40 wounded. The figures cannot be confirmed because emergency workers or security officials weren't able to get in.The White House claimed it supports Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Saniora's efforts to handle fighting, and the State Department defended the Lebanese army, saying it had been working in a "legitimate manner" against "provocations by violent extremists" operating from the camp.Black smoke filled the sun over Nahr el-Bared as fires raged all day and heavy gunfire and explosions rang out constantly. Shells may be seen thudding into buildings from the seaside camp.Fighting paused briefly inside the afternoon to allow the evacuation of 18 wounded civilians, according to Saleh Badran of the Palestinian Red Crescent Society. However the fighting quickly resumed. Ambulances raced over the streets of nearby Tripoli, where many shops were closed and lots of residents stayed inside."There a wide range of wounded. We're under siege. There's a shortage of bread, medicine and electricity. There are children under the rubble," Sana Abu Faraj, a refugee, told Al-Jazeera television by cellular phone from the camp.Late Monday, residents reported an explosion in a Muslim neighborhood of Beirut, the capital. The Future TV station said the blast occurred in the Verdun shopping area, while Hezbollah's Al-Manar television claimed it took place in a car park in the posh district. Television footage showed a burning car and a minimum of one injured man. On Sunday night, a bomb near a mall from the Christian sector of the capital killed a girl and wounded 12 other folks.Lebanon was already in the midst of its worst political crisis relating to the Western-backed government and Hezbollah-led opposition since the end of the civil war.The battle was an unprecedented showdown involving the Lebanese army and militant groups who have arisen in Lebanon's Palestinian refugee camps, that are home to tens of thousands of people living amid poverty and crime and which Lebanese troops are certainly not allowed to enter.The troops were fighting friends called Fatah Islam, whose leader claims he is inspired by al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and was training militants for attacks far away. Lebanese officials have also accused Syria utilizing Fatah Islam to stir up trouble in Lebanon, electric power charge Damascus has denied.Causing the problem, a draft Resolution is circulating in the Security Council which will create a special tribunal to attempt individuals implicated from the assassination of Lebanon's former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri."That idea has pitted Lebanon's pm and president and divided factions within Lebanon," says CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk. "The United Nations secretary-general weighed in on Monday, saying that the actions of Fatah al-Islam are panic or anxiety attack on Lebanon's sovereignty and stability, but would not take a position on the controversial tribunal."Lebanese officials said one of several men killed Sunday would be a suspect in a failed German train bombing — another indication the camp had become a refuge for Fatah Islam militants planning attacks outside Lebanon. In the past, others connected with the group in the camp have said they were aiming to send trained fighters into Iraq and the group's leader continues to be linked to al Qaeda in Iraq. no previous page next 1/2 mulberry shoulder bag
By Michael Barone, Thomas Jefferson Street blogOf course, you've all heard or read Barack Obama's inaugural speech. Oahu is the subject of my forthcoming digital U.S. News column, in which I suggest that Obama could get the same kind of positive response from the public that John F. Kennedy did 48 years ago. Here, where I have got unlimited space, I want to make another point. Near the end of the speech, Obama asserted "our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus--and nonbelievers. We're shaped by every language and culture, sucked from every end on this Earth." This sounds unobjectionable, and a lot of it is. Were a nation of multiple religions, and it's nice to include Muslims and Hindus and nonbelievers. Heck, the spot of worship closest to my parent's condominium in Troy, Mich., can be a Hindu temple. And, yes, we have been shaped to some limited extent by every language and culture.But we're influenced much more by one language and by one culture than some other, the English language and what the late Samuel Huntington referred to as the Anglo-Protestant culture. In my 2001 book, The brand new Americans , I talked about how different peoples--Irish, Italians, Jews, blacks, Latinos, Asians--have been or are being interwoven into the American fabric; I became more optimistic than Huntington that Latinos happen to be and could be so interwoven. The weaving metaphor still strikes me as being a good one, better than the melting pot--how many people these days know what a melting pot is?--because it implies that the basic character from the fabric remains virtually the same, with different accents. And that's pretty much what has happened. David Hackett Fischer, in their splendid Albion's Seed , shows how a cultural folkways that different sets of colonial Americans brought from different parts of the Uk have persisted even now. Michael Dukakis's parents were born in Greece, but he's a recognizable Colonial Yankee in his cultural attitudes.So when Obama says, "We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end on this Earth," he's not far away from plugging the multicultural idea, more frequent in Western Europe than within America, that every culture has got the same moral worth--except maybe ours, which can be worse. That's a very dangerous and wrongheaded way of thinking. And directly contrary to the way our first black president--and our first Catholic one--won their elections. Kennedy excelled and Obama excels at speaking english. The civic culture they mastered was our Anglo-Protestant culture, despite the fact that one went to a Catholic church and also the other's father would be a citizen of Kenya (and never, I think, as people tend to say, an immigrant: I presume he was in the United States on a student visa, so we know that he went the place to find Kenya and participated in politics there). Kennedy and Obama won since they did not fit the negative stereotypes of the ethnic groups, just as Margaret Thatcher won in the uk not because she was warm and cuddly but because she was the Iron Lady. Kennedy seemed a lot more like an English lord than an Irish pol (one among his sisters was engaged on the marquis of Hartington), and Obama seemed more like a law professor than the usual ghetto protester.I don't want to make an excessive amount of this. Elsewhere in the speech, Obama referred movingly to American history. His peroration featured a quote from George Washington at Valley Forge. Overall, he's an outstanding example of someone using a foreign heritage being interwoven in to the American fabric. Let's quickly make it clear. We're not every country. We have been, as the slogan to the inaugural festivities put it, One.-- Read more by Michael Barone . -- Find out more from the Thomas Jefferson Street blog . -- Read mre in regards to the inauguration . By Michael Barone house of fraser uggs
This column from National Review Online was written by James S. Robbins. Wait a moment -- so there were WMDs in Iraq? The Kerry campaign, the media, assorted pundits, while others are making much of the disappearance from the 380 tons of explosives from the al Qaqaa storage facility south of Baghdad. Based on the IAEA, the U.N. watchdog agency now apparently from the service of the Democratic National Committee, a few of the explosives could be used to detonate nuclear weapons. Wow — nuclear-weapon components were in Iraq? Shouldn't the headline be, "Saddam Had 'Em?"The opposition really should get its story straight. The president cannot be taken to part of inventing the Iraqi WMD threat, and simultaneously disparaged for not securing Saddam's dangerous WMD-related materials.The cache at al Qaqaa was not the only WMD-related material in news bulletins recently. Another IAEA report came out two weeks ago that did not get as much play. Based on this account, dual-use equipment that is used to make nuclear weapons was removed from various locations inside Iraq. The Duelfer Report speculated this equipment might have been taken during the chaos in the invasion. The equipment was "professionally looted" by another account, and may have gone to Iran or Syria. Isn't it significant that equipment that is used to make nuclear weapons was there initially? Don't these constitute aspects of a WMD program?Too, if CBS would like to recycle old news so as to influence the election, think about this story: 1.77 metric a great deal of low-enriched uranium and other nuclear material with the Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center (Saddam's main nuclear research and development center) was secured by the us and flown out of the country last July. In line with the Energy Department this material could have been used to make a radiological dispersion device (a.k.a. a grimy bomb) or "diverted to compliment a nuclear weapons program." One and only thing we found in Iraq that's more hazardous than this haul was Saddam Hussein. The United States was able successfully to deny this dangerous material to terrorists, rogue states or other people. This good news story dropped just like a stone when it arrived. And unlike most of the hype with the last few days, this story contains the benefit of being true. The missing explosives from al Qaqaa also enhance the possibility that other WMD-related materials met exactly the same fate. The IAEA had seen the al Qaqaa material in January 2003, but by time U.S. troops appeared on April 10, they'd disappeared. The dual-use technologies mentioned inside the other IAEA report also had been moved or looted. This implies that still other WMDs and related technologies might have been given or revoked in the days leading up to the war, or shortly after the Coalition attacks began. It is widely believed, though not conclusively proved, much of this went to Syria. The Iraq Survey Group interviewed Iraqi agents who claimed to get helped moved the WMD materials. This charge was repeated by David Kay when he left the ISG a few months ago. The Blix Report found 1,000 plenty of chemical weapons missing from Iraq, and last May this column discussed a structured al Qaeda attack in Jordan involving 20 a great deal of chemicals. The attack was finished, and the subsequent investigation showed strong links to Syria. Connect your own personal dots.So between your al Qaqaa explosives, the dual-use equipment, the Tuwaitha nuclear material, the missing chemical weapons, along with the Syrian connection, it sounds just like the WMD rationale is much stronger than most critics give it credit for. One can only imagine what Saddam could have done given the possibility to put them all together. These are just a few reasons why Operation Iraqi Freedom was the best war, in the right place, in the right time. James S. Robbins is senior fellow in national-security affairs in the American Foreign Policy Council and an NRO contributor. By James S. RobbinsReprinted with permission from National Review Online mulberry clutch
This story was written by Paul Armstrong, University Daily Kansan And that's the flaw in the Bush doctrine, then-Sen. Barack Obama told ABC News anchor Charles Gibson in January. It wasn't that he went after those that attacked America. It was that he went after people that didn't.By consensus, the Bush doctrine is dead. Its tenure just as one organizing principle of yankee foreign policy did not survive the Iraq War. Bushs policies, in accordance with the president-elect, distracted America from more pressing security concerns, stifled its ease of action, diminished its influence and hindered necessary cooperation with allies in accordance struggles. Yet, the decision on the Bush years remains open. Notwithstanding the exorbitant costs with the Iraq War, it remains seen if the alternative course proposed by President-elect Obama will yield better results at lower costs. Make no mistake: The costs were high, however the Bush doctrine did yield results results that a lot of containment and diplomacy failed to deliver on Iran and North Korea. Saddam Hussein is dead. The matter of Iraq continues to be dealt a final resolution, and just because of this will an Obama administration confront other matters that will have been impossible to control with Saddam Hussein still astride the Middle East, thwarting American designs. The test-case in-waiting that may reveal the wisdom or foolishness of Obamas critique from the Bush years is Iran, the principal source of instability in the centre East. With the political stakes high fitness center abroad, Obama is not wrong to want a diplomatic resolution. In the grandest fantasies of Democratic policy wonks, Iran will be offered a comprehensive diplomatic bargain this agreement it would abandon its support of terrorism and its particular pursuit of nuclear power in return for the lifting of sanctions, economic aid, usage of Western markets and technology, nuclear fuel and also other incentives. If it plays out according to this outline, then Obama will face few obstacles to keep his promise of an accountable withdrawal from Iraq. The spot will stabilize, and Obama probably will easily win re-election in 2012. But what if the architects from the Islamic Revolution of 1979 have no intention of dealing with America? Reacting to Tuesdays election results, Seyyid Hossein, a 30-year-old Iranian school teacher, told The Guardian, Obama's victory could improve things as they has his at once his shoulders. However believe the regime does not want better relations together with the U.S. It desires to have a big enemy to frighten people and maintain its rule. It remains a self-serving actual liberal faith that Bushs obstinacy has become the only barrier to regional rapprochement. In case Iran declines to come to terms together with the Great Satan, a quick, responsible withdrawal from Iraq will likely be impossible, and Obama will quickly realize himself in the shoes of his predecessor, confronting the worlds largest regimes as they ask for the worlds most dangerous weapons. If Obama fails, then Bush was right, and it's also not unlikely that pre-emption, the premise of the Bush doctrine, will again see its day, now brought to you by Democrats. The Bush years demonstrated that pre-emption is a bad option, nevertheless it may yet prove to be the least bad option with a policy menu filled with worse options. mulberry oversized alexa
Civil rights leader John Lewis has dropped his support for Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential bid and only Barack Obama.Lewis, a Democratic congressman from Atlanta, is easily the most prominent black leader to defect from Clinton's campaign when confronted with near-majority black support for Obama in recent voting. He also is a superdelegate who gets a vote at this summer's national convention in Denver."After a little time for serious reflection about this issue, I have decided any time I cast my vote like a superdelegate at the Democratic convention, it is my duty as a representative with the 5th Congressional District to convey the will of the people," Lewis said inside a statement. "As a U.S. representative, it's my role not to make an effort to subdue or suppress the drive of the people, but to help you it prosper and grow."Lewis' constituents supported Obama roughly 3-to-1 in Georgia's Feb. 5 primary. His endorsement was really a coveted prize among the Democratic candidates thanks to his standing as the last major civil rights leaders with the 1960s.Lewis said he'd tried to contact former President Clinton and Hillary Clinton."I think the candidacy of Senator Obama represents the starting of a new movement in American political history that began within the hearts and minds of the people of this nation," he said. "And I want to be on the side of the people, on the side of the spirit of history."The reservations Lewis is now expressing follow endorsements for Obama from two U.S. senators who'd been on the fence: North Dakota's Byron Dorgan today and Connecticut's Chris Dodd yesterday, reports CBS News correspondent Jim Axelrod. The Democratic Party establishment may seem like it's trying to tell Clinton something-that it could be time to get out of the race. The Obama campaign also said a lot more than 1 million people have contributed to the campaign - a threshold crossed on Wednesday. Many donors have given $25 or $50, he said. The average donation is a little more than $100."We have funded this campaign at the grassroots level," campaign manager David Plouffe told reporters on a conference call. "It's really built being worn by the American people who're getting involved in this campaign. A lot of people giving us money can also be volunteering."Dorgan said Obama has supported key trade issues. "He and I feel the same way. We both believe in trade and lots of it. We just insist it which it be fair to your country - the policies be fair."NAFTA, the disposable trade agreement with Canada and Mexico, is unpopular with blue-collar workers whose votes are critical inside the Democratic primary Tuesday in Ohio.Obama has won 11 straight primaries and caucuses since Super Tuesday, increased his advantage in the all-important delegate count and has attracted the support of his congressional colleagues. On Tuesday, he secured the endorsement of one-time presidential candidate Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut.Clinton has become endorsed by 13 of her Senate colleagues, Obama 10.Dorgan was a friend of former President Clinton along with a vocal critic of President Bush. As chairman from the Democratic Policy Committee, he's led hearings on government accountability issues related to the Iraq war and hurricanes around the Gulf Coast.Dorgan has produced a reputation for championing populist farm programs, criticizing Republican free-trade policies and assailing big business. He made headlines in 2005 when he called for a windfall profits tax on major oil companies.Last year, he authored a measured to close funding of a Department of transportation pilot program required under NAFTA that could have opened the U.S. to cross-border long-haul Mexican tractor trailers. This system was opposed by the Teamsters Union, and others. ugg classic tall
[url=http://taniaroxborogh.com/uggclassicmini-uk.html]http://taniaroxborogh.com/uggclassicmini-uk.html[/url]
|
| |
| |
